
Industrial Investment Casting With 3D Printed Patterns Using Formlabs Clear Cast Resin
This white paper presents the methods by which several established foundries were able to cast metal parts using 3D printed patterns produced by Formlabs’ stereolithography (SLA) 3D printers. It showcases the full process, detailing the use of latticed Clear Cast Resin acrylic-like parts to produce patterns that were easily integrated into typical industrial investment casting foundry processes without significant workflow or hardware changes. The included case studies also summarize their findings and show how using these patterns enabled the elimination of expensive and high lead time metal tooling that is normally required for the production of parts.
Industrial Investment Casting With 3D Printed Patterns Using Formlabs Clear Cast Resin

This white paper presents the methods by which several established foundries were able to cast metal parts using 3D printed patterns produced by Formlabs’ stereolithography (SLA) 3D printers. It showcases the full process, detailing the use of latticed Clear Cast Resin acrylic-like parts to produce patterns that were easily integrated into typical industrial investment casting foundry processes without significant workflow or hardware changes. The included case studies also summarize their findings and show how using these patterns enabled the elimination of expensive and high lead time metal tooling that is normally required for the production of parts.
Introduction
Investment Casting
Investment casting, also known as lost-wax casting, is a versatile foundry process for producing metal parts with intricate shapes. From lightweight automotive components to golf clubs to jet turbines to art sculptures, this process spans nearly all industries and is relied upon for highquality and high-integrity metal parts. It enables the production of geometries that cannot be manufactured in any other ways and with a high surface finish.

University of Northern Iowa (UNI) team pouring metal from melt furnace into a crucible
Investment casting typically involves three main steps: creating an expendable pattern, making a non-permanent ceramic mold from this pattern, and casting or pouring liquid metal inside the ceramic mold. The pattern is traditionally fabricated through wax injection molding using metal tooling. This technique requires multiple operations, specialized equipment, and extensive labor by skilled workers. Metal tooling is usually achieved by CNC machining and comes with high costs and long lead times. As a result, investment casting can be expensive, especially for lowvolume production.
Foundries Test Results
Working with these foundries, Bronze, Brass, Aluminum (A356), 6-4 Titanium, 4140 Steel, 8620 Steel, stainless steel 316, and 17-4 PH were all cast. The parts were burnt out in a furnace between 700 °C and 900 °C in all cases, with no autoclave. Most parts were connected to standard investment casting wax sprues and dipped in each customer’s particular shelling system.
Case Study
While there are many different exact chemistries and methods used in investment casting and tested with Formlabs’ process, this is how the Foundry 4.0 at the University of Northern Iowa successfully was able to cast parts in Aluminum A356.
Parts were initially made into a tetrahedron lattice using Materialise’s Lattice Module with 0.5 mm walls and 1 mm diameter lattice diameter. This was then printed at 100 micron layer heights with the Form 3L and cleaned following Formlabs’ standard printing process. Once post-processed, the parts were adhered to a stock casting sprue using sticky wax. They then used a 100% silica shelling system, starting with Remet RP-1 flour as a primary coat, and RG-1 for backing coats, typically using 2 primary coat dips and 3 backing coats, with stucco applied after the second primary coat and after each subsequent dip. All of the shelling process was carried out automatically by an automation process to guarantee the most uniform possible coat with a minimal amount of manual labor, taking in total 9-10 hours for a single sprue.
Once dried, the part was flash-fired at 900 °C (1650 °F) for 2 hrs, and then cooled and transferred to the casting facility. Prior to casting, the shell was preheated to 540 °C and then the aluminum was cast when it was 700 °C-750 °C. They then removed the shells via a combination of breaking off the bulk pieces and blasting off the remainder, resulting in a clean final piece.
Foundry Feedback
“Our main reason for purchasing the 3L was pattern cost. For this impeller, we started out using our customers traditional wax injection tooling that was difficult and time consuming to run. We went to a PMMA printed pattern to save on labor, but the pattern costs kept rising to over $300 the last time we used one. Even amortizing the 3L and associated equipment, we will at a minimum break even on costs for our current order, and save over $200 per part on upcoming orders. There is very little difference in our process, both before and after casting, between the PMMA and Clear Cast SLA patterns.”

“The Formlabs system, utilizing the Clear Cast Resin, allows us to produce highly detailed patterns for art casting faster, more consistently, and with a fraction of the labor costs required of traditional hand chased wax patterns. The low cost of acquiring additional machines provides us with a quick path to scale out to meet client demands. We’ve also been very impressed with the rapid rate of innovation, completeness of the Formlabs ecosystem, and the knowledge and support that they have provided us.”

Results and Cost Analysis
Based on user feedback, patterns 3D printed with Formlabs Clear Cast Resin can produce investment cast parts with quality comparable to traditional wax patterns. 3D printed patterns may be more brittle than wax patterns and should be handled with care. However, the burnout is clean without any noticeable ash left in the visible portion of the shell. The final metal part does not show any unusual defects.
By allowing the direct production of patterns, Formlabs allows parts to be produced immediately and without tooling, soluble cores, or other complex wax formation techniques. Features like undercuts, tortuous channels, and thin walls that prove difficult to pattern for wax injection are easy to 3D print. The table below illustrates the cost and time savings of using 3D printed tools compared to alternative methods.
PART |
COMPLEX IMPELLER PART |
SIMPLE PUMP IMPELLER - 12” |
Volume of production |
50 parts |
50 parts |
Alternative tooling method |
Wax Injection with metal tooling, soluble wax cores, and wax chills |
Wax Injection with metal tooling |
Alternative tooling cost |
$60,000 |
$11,000 |
Cost - Printed |
$78/part |
$30/part |
Lead time savings |
14 weeks |
8 weeks |
This table shows that on many parts, even simple ones, foundries can save tens of thousands of dollars.
Process Overview

Pattern Design

Pattern Design

Pattern Design

Pattern Design